Post-Graffiti in Lisbon: on spatial localization and market absorption

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Revi, Rohit
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-30T11:28:17Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-30T11:28:17Z
dc.date.issued 2017-12
dc.identifier.citation Revi, Rohit, "Post-Graffiti in Lisbon: on spatial localization and market absorption", Cidades, Comunidades e Terri trios, DOI: 10.15847/citiescommunitiesterritories.dec2017.035.art02, no. 35, pp. 27-38, Dec. 2017. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1645-0639
dc.identifier.issn 2182-3030
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.15847/citiescommunitiesterritories.dec2017.035.art02
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/3394
dc.description.abstract Graffiti-making as a disruptive art has been historically well located within the politics of territoriality/transgression, deindustrialization/decline, appropriation/affirmation and other inter-related frameworks. Such historicizations exist in parallel to the history of institutionalization of graffiti-making, leading up to the emergence of the phrase post-graffiti in the discourse. The post-graffiti has alternatively and independently also been used to describe an empirically observed shift in graffiti making practices; from the typographical to the iconographical. In this context, the operationalization of a set of urban intervention policies by the Lisbon City Council, that were designed to institutionalize, sanction and take control of graffiti-making, provides an interesting inroad into the processes that underlie its market absorption. Through a field analysis of street art in Lisbon as well as an examination of the intervention policy and its consequences, this paper argues that the intervention policies and associated public rhetoric manufactured a binary of order-disorder within the practices of graffiti-making, enabling graffiti and graffiti-making practices in Lisbon to be spatially localized, facilitating market activities. For the graffiti and the graffiti-makers, state/administrative sanction and the emergence of market activities meant heightened security, safety and a greater audience field conditions that made iconographical aesthetics a virtue and a necessity. Thus, the post-graffiti shift has to be understood within the context of institutionalization. These processes are to be looked at as particular conditions of the neoliberal capital.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Rohit Revi
dc.format.extent no. 35, pp. 27-38
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Instituto University rio de Lisboa, Centro de Estudos Territoriais en_US
dc.subject post-graffiti en_US
dc.subject street art en_US
dc.subject Lisbon en_US
dc.subject transgression en_US
dc.subject market absorption en_US
dc.title Post-Graffiti in Lisbon: on spatial localization and market absorption en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.journal Cidades, Comunidades e Territerios


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account