Capturing the peak response over all possible orientations for direction of arrival of multicomponent seismic excitation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vats, Falak
dc.contributor.author Basu, Dhiman
dc.coverage.spatial United States of America
dc.date.accessioned 2025-07-25T11:43:48Z
dc.date.available 2025-07-25T11:43:48Z
dc.date.issued 2025-07
dc.identifier.citation Vats, Falak and Basu, Dhiman, "Capturing the peak response over all possible orientations for direction of arrival of multicomponent seismic excitation", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.70018, Jul. 2025.
dc.identifier.issn 0098-8847
dc.identifier.issn 1096-9845
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70018
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/11666
dc.description.abstract Ground motion is often recommended to be applied with all possible orientations relative to the plan layout of a structure, and the resulting maximum response for an engineering demand parameter (EDP) over all possible directions of arrival (DOAs) is considered in seismic design. The associated DOA is denoted as the critical orientation, which is expected to differ from one EDP to another. A description of the six-component acceleration time series completely defines the required ground motion inputs for most structures. This paper proposes a framework for the maximum response of an EDP over all possible DOAs and the associated critical orientation using three sets of response history analysis of the structure, followed by nominal post-processing. The proposed formulation is “mathematically exact” for linear-elastic systems. A 5- and 30-story reinforced-concrete (RC) building constituted from moment-resisting frames (MRFs) and recorded six-component ground excitations is considered for illustration. Several EDPs are included in this illustration comparing the associated critical orientations, and the resulting variation is significant. The response of an EDP does not significantly change in the vicinity of critical orientation, which, however, is not true at any other arbitrary orientation. Finally, a couple of RC-MRF buildings are considered to understand the variation in critical orientation if the structure is expected to respond in the nonlinear regime. Interestingly, the critical orientation does not alter significantly owing to this inelastic excursion. Based on this limited investigation, the proposed framework may conveniently be incorporated into routine seismic design to account for the maximum direction shaking of multicomponent seismic excitation.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Falak Vats and Dhiman Basu
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.subject Critical orientation
dc.subject Incidence angle
dc.subject Maximum direction shaking
dc.subject Response history analysis
dc.subject Seismic design
dc.subject Seismic performance assessment
dc.title Capturing the peak response over all possible orientations for direction of arrival of multicomponent seismic excitation
dc.type Article
dc.relation.journal Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account