Strut-and-Tie Model for seismic design of confined masonry buildings

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ghaisas, Kunal V.
dc.contributor.author Basu, Dhiman
dc.contributor.author Brzev, Svetlana
dc.contributor.author Gavilán, Juan José Pérez
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-23T10:06:10Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-23T10:06:10Z
dc.date.issued 2017-08
dc.identifier.citation Ghaisas, Kunal V.; Basu, Dhiman; Brzev, Svetlana and Gavilán, Juan José Pérez, “Strut-and-Tie Model for seismic design of confined masonry buildings”, Construction and Building Materials, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.200, vol. 147, pp. 677-700, Aug. 2017.
dc.identifier.issn 0950-0618
dc.identifier.issn 1879-0526
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/2944
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.200
dc.description.abstract The Strut-and-Tie-Model (STM) of a confined masonry wall, with or without opening, consists of an equivalent system, in which the masonry wall is modelled as compression struts and the reinforced concrete (RC) confining elements are modelled as is (i.e., as present in the wall). Tension ties are ignored owing to the negligible tensile strength of masonry. Although the joints of tie-column and tie-beams are not intended for moment resisting, these are yet treated as the moment resisting in numerical model to avoid instability. Consequently, a typical compression strut is connected to the joints at either end with moment released. Purpose of this paper is to outline the guidelines for developing STMs for seismic design of confined masonry wall panels, including single- and multi-storey wall panels with and without openings. Behaviour of two single-storey adjacent panels with or without openings, are also considered. Although the main objective is to develop STMs for walls subjected to lateral seismic loading, the effect of gravity load has been also considered in the analysis. Well distinct STM configurations are noted for the single storey panels. STM for adjacent wall panels and multistorey wall are shown to be arrived at from that of the individual single storey panels. Throughout this paper, the masonry is modelled using equivalent properties and hence, the effect of relative variation of mortar and brick properties are not adequately captured. This may have considerable influence on the resulting STM configurations. Although STM should be evolutive in nature enabling prediction of different failure modes of CM walls, the scope of the analytical model in this paper is limited to the linear-elastic analysis and hence, the strut orientation is likely to be altered as the building ventures into the inelastic regime. Nevertheless, the STM proposed in this paper may be used as the basis of developing such an evolutive model enabling a displacement based design framework of confined masonry buildings. en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Kunal V. Ghaisas, Dhiman Basu, Svetlana Brzev and Juan José Pérez Gavilán
dc.format.extent Vol. 147, pp. 677-700
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Confined masonry en_US
dc.subject Strut-and-Tie-Model (STM) en_US
dc.subject Displacement-based design en_US
dc.subject Seismic analysis en_US
dc.title Strut-and-Tie Model for seismic design of confined masonry buildings en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.journal Construction and Building Materials


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account