Spatial variation and conditional simulation of seismic ground motion

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rodda, Gopala Krishna
dc.contributor.author Basu, Dhiman
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-22T13:00:26Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-22T13:00:26Z
dc.date.issued 2018-05
dc.identifier.citation Rodda, Gopala Krishna and Basu, Dhiman, “Spatial variation and conditional simulation of seismic ground motion”, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-018-0397-6, May 2018. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1570-761X
dc.identifier.issn 1573-1456
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/3676
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0397-6
dc.description.abstract Spatially varying ground motion (SVGM) may have influence on certain civil engineering structures with spatially extended superstructure and/or substructures. Conditional simulation of spatially varying ground motion (CSSVGM) may be viewed from two different perspectives. Most procedures available in the literature neglect the spatial variability in auto-spectral density (ASD) and estimate the SVGM through cross-spectral density (CSD) which was computed using the empirical coherency models. This paper proposes a coherency model that accounts for the spatial variability of ASD. A framework has been developed for the CSSVGM, through the mapping of both proposed coherency model and ASD over the footprint of an array. Current framework (existing in the literature) accounts for only the phase variability of SVGM while proposed framework accounts for both phase and amplitude variability. Ground motion generated from both perspectives is then assessed with the data recorded over SMART1 and LSST arrays. For the purpose of assessment, a definition of target spectrum based on the direction of arrival is explored. The effect of choice of coherency model on the simulated spatially varying ground motion is investigated first. Spectra resulting from both the perspectives are assessed against the target spectrum. An attempt has been made to predict the SVGM for a future event using a coherency model calibrated against a past event and an estimate of ASD of the seed ground motion. Finally, the effect of form of ASD (of a seed ground motion) on SVGM simulated is investigated by considering the ASD in different forms. Simulating SVGM through the mapping of both coherency model and ASD seems to be more appropriate than through CSD. en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Gopala Krishna and Rodda Dhiman Basu
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Verlag en_US
dc.subject Spatial variability en_US
dc.subject Generation of spatially varying ground motion en_US
dc.subject Target spectrum en_US
dc.subject Phase variability en_US
dc.subject Amplitude variability en_US
dc.subject Functional from of auto-spectral density en_US
dc.subject Event-to-event variability of lagged coherency en_US
dc.title Spatial variation and conditional simulation of seismic ground motion en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.journal Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account