Simple Graphical Method for Detection of a Partial Blockage Or Leak in a Single Pipeline

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumar, Prabhat
dc.contributor.author Mohapatra, Pranab K.
dc.coverage.spatial United States of America
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-23T15:40:09Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-23T15:40:09Z
dc.date.issued 2021-02
dc.identifier.citation Kumar, Prabhat and Mohapatra, Pranab K., “Simple graphical method for detection of a partial blockage or leak in a single pipeline”, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, DOI: 10.1115/1.4050217, vol. 143, no. 5, Feb. 2021. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0094-9930
dc.identifier.issn 1528-8978
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050217
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/6319
dc.description.abstract Transient-based methods in the frequency domain are used for fault detection in pipes. However, the required measurements are performed with a large number of valve frequencies. Sometimes the number of frequencies in traditional frequency-domain methods can be in the hundreds. More runs are required with higher harmonics when the required number of frequencies is more. The current study aims to overcome this difficulty of requirement of higher number of frequencies. The location and the size of a single leak or a single discrete blockage are proposed to be predicted using two appropriately chosen low frequencies. Iso-Pressure Frequency Responses (IPFRs) are generated by performing numerical experiments with these two low frequencies enabling determination of the fault. The methodology is demonstrated through various numerical examples. The results show that the procedure is quite accurate, with a high level of agreement between the actual and the predicted fault parameters. The error in the result is of the order of the chosen discretization. An uncertainty analysis is performed to illustrate that the prediction error caused by the error in the measurements of the pressure frequency responses (PFRs) depends on the location and the size of the fault itself. The error in prediction results is analyzed in uncertainty analysis with 0.10%, 0.15%, and 0.20% error in the peak head measurement. For the same error in the PFR measurement, the fault lying in a thin density of the contours would lead to a higher error in the final solution.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Prabhat Kumar and Pranab Mohapatra
dc.language.iso en_Us en_US
dc.publisher American Society of Mechanical Engineers en_US
dc.subject Leak detection en_US
dc.subject Transients en_US
dc.subject Discrete blockage detection en_US
dc.subject Iso-Pressure Frequency Response en_US
dc.title Simple Graphical Method for Detection of a Partial Blockage Or Leak in a Single Pipeline en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.journal Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account