Translating the internal climate variability from climate variables to hydropower production

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Upadhyay, Divya
dc.contributor.author Dixit, Sudhanshu
dc.contributor.author Bhatia, Udit
dc.date.accessioned 2012-09-20T03:32:51Z
dc.date.available 2012-09-20T03:32:51Z
dc.date.issued 2022-03
dc.identifier.citation Upadhyay, Divya; Dixit, Sudhanshu and Bhatia, Udit, "Translating the internal climate variability from climate variables to hydropower production", arXiv, Cornell University Library, DOI: arXiv:2203.01596, Mar. 2022. en_US
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.uri http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01596
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/7593
dc.description.abstract Quantifying uncertainties in estimating future hydropower production directly or indirectly affects India's energy security, planning, and management. The chaotic and nonlinear nature of atmospheric processes results in considerable Internal Climate Variability (ICV) for future projections of climate variables. Multiple Initial Condition Ensembles (MICE) and Multi-Model Ensembles (MME) are often used to analyze the role of ICV and model uncertainty in precipitation and temperature. However, there are limited studies focusing on quantifying the role of internal variability on impact variables, including hydropower production. In this study, we analyze the role of ICV and model uncertainty on three prominent hydropower plants of India using MICE of EC-Earth3 and MME from CMIP6. We estimate the streamflow projections for all ensembles using the Variable Infiltration Capacity hydrological model for four time periods, historical, near, mid and far-term. We estimate maximum hydropower production generated using monthly release and hydraulic head available at the reservoir. We also analyzed the role of bias correction in hydropower production. The results show that ICV plays a significant role in estimating streamflow and hydropower estimation for monsoon and throughout the year, respectively. Model uncertainty contributes more to total uncertainty than ICV in estimating the streamflow and potential hydropower. However, ICV is increasing towards the far-term. We also show that bias correction does not preserve the internal variability in estimating the streamflow. Although there is an increase in uncertainty for estimated streamflow, mean hydropower shows the decrease towards the far-term for February to May, more prominent for MICE than MME. The results suggest a need to incorporate uncertainty due to internal variability for addressing power security in changing climate scenarios.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Divya Upadhyay, Sudhanshu Dixit and Udit Bhatia
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Cornell University Library en_US
dc.subject Internal climate variability en_US
dc.subject Multiple initial condition ensembles en_US
dc.subject Variable infiltration capacity en_US
dc.subject Streamflow en_US
dc.subject CMIP6 en_US
dc.title Translating the internal climate variability from climate variables to hydropower production en_US
dc.type Pre-Print en_US
dc.relation.journal arXiv


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account