Contribution of spicules to solar coronal emission

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mondal, Shanwlee Sow
dc.contributor.author Klimchuk, James A.
dc.contributor.author Sarkar, Aveek
dc.coverage.spatial United Kingdom
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-01T08:45:00Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-01T08:45:00Z
dc.date.issued 2022-10
dc.identifier.citation Mondal, Shanwlee Sow; Klimchuk, James A. and Sarkar, Aveek, "Contribution of spicules to solar coronal emission", The Astrophysical Journal, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac879b, vol. 937, no. 2, Oct. 2022. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0004-637X
dc.identifier.issn 1538-4357
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac879b
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iitgn.ac.in/handle/123456789/8264
dc.description.abstract Recent high-resolution imaging and spectroscopic observations have generated renewed interest in spicules' role in explaining the hot corona. Some studies suggest that some spicules, often classified as type II, may provide significant mass and energy to the corona. Here we use numerical simulations to investigate whether such spicules can produce the observed coronal emission without any additional coronal heating agent. Model spicules consisting of a cold body and hot tip are injected into the base of a warm (0.5 MK) equilibrium loop with different tip temperatures and injection velocities. Both piston- and pressure-driven shocks are produced. We find that the hot tip cools rapidly and disappears from coronal emission lines such as Fe xii 195 and Fe xiv 274. Prolonged hot emission is produced by preexisting loop material heated by the shock and by thermal conduction from the shock. However, the shapes and Doppler shifts of synthetic line profiles show significant discrepancies with observations. Furthermore, spatially and temporally averaged intensities are extremely low, suggesting that if the observed intensities from the quiet Sun and active regions were solely due to type II spicules, one to several orders of magnitude more spicules would be required than have been reported in the literature. This conclusion applies strictly to the ejected spicular material. We make no claims about emissions connected with waves or coronal currents that may be generated during the ejection process and heat the surrounding area.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Shanwlee Sow Mondal, James A. Klimchuk and Aveek Sarkar
dc.format.extent vol. 937, no. 2
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher IOP Publishing en_US
dc.subject Solar coronal emission en_US
dc.subject Spicules en_US
dc.subject Coronal heating agent en_US
dc.subject Doppler shifts en_US
dc.subject Type II spicules en_US
dc.title Contribution of spicules to solar coronal emission en_US
dc.type Journal Paper en_US
dc.relation.journal The Astrophysical Journal


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account