Repository logo
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Scholalry Output
  3. Publications
  4. Capturing the Peak Response Over All Possible Orientations for Direction of Arrival of Multicomponent Seismic Excitation
 
  • Details

Capturing the Peak Response Over All Possible Orientations for Direction of Arrival of Multicomponent Seismic Excitation

Source
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
Author(s)
F., Vats, Falak
D., Basu, Dhiman  
DOI
10.1002/eqe.70018
Abstract
Ground motion is often recommended to be applied with all possible orientations relative to the plan layout of a structure, and the resulting maximum response for an engineering demand parameter (EDP) over all possible directions of arrival (DOAs) is considered in seismic design. The associated DOA is denoted as the critical orientation, which is expected to differ from one EDP to another. A description of the six-component acceleration time series completely defines the required ground motion inputs for most structures. This paper proposes a framework for the maximum response of an EDP over all possible DOAs and the associated critical orientation using three sets of response history analysis of the structure, followed by nominal post-processing. The proposed formulation is �mathematically exact� for linear-elastic systems. A 5- and 30-story reinforced-concrete (RC) building constituted from moment-resisting frames (MRFs) and recorded six-component ground excitations is considered for illustration. Several EDPs are included in this illustration comparing the associated critical orientations, and the resulting variation is significant. The response of an EDP does not significantly change in the vicinity of critical orientation, which, however, is not true at any other arbitrary orientation. Finally, a couple of RC-MRF buildings are considered to understand the variation in critical orientation if the structure is expected to respond in the nonlinear regime. Interestingly, the critical orientation does not alter significantly owing to this inelastic excursion. Based on this limited investigation, the proposed framework may conveniently be incorporated into routine seismic design to account for the maximum direction shaking of multicomponent seismic excitation. � 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Unpaywall
Sherpa Url
https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/7439
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105009981365&doi=10.1002%2Feqe.70018&partnerID=40&md5=1442dc590d02b103bc30d8ca7aee0a50
https://d8.irins.org/handle/IITG2025/29343
Keywords
Direction of arrival
Seismology
Structural frames
Critical orientation
Directionof-arrival (DOA)
Engineering demand parameters
History analysis
Incidence angles
Maximum direction shaking
Multicomponents
Response history
Response history analyze
Seismic performance assessment
Seismic design
IITGN Knowledge Repository Developed and Managed by Library

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify