Repository logo
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. IIT Gandhinagar
  3. Mathematics
  4. MATH Publications
  5. The additive-multiplicative distance matrix of a graph, and a novel third invariant
 
  • Details

The additive-multiplicative distance matrix of a graph, and a novel third invariant

Source
arXiv
Date Issued
2023-09-01
Author(s)
Choudhury, Projesh Nath
Khare, Apporva
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2309.08691
Abstract
Graham showed with Pollak and Hoffman-Hosoya that for any directed graph G with strong blocks Ge, the determinant det(DG) and cofactor-sum cof(DG) of the distance matrix DG can be computed from the same quantities for the blocks Ge. This was extended to trees - and in our recent work to any graph - with multiplicative and q-distance matrices. For trees, we went further and unified all previous variants with weights in a unital commutative ring, into a distance matrix with additive and multiplicative edge-data. n this work: (1) We introduce the additive-multiplicative distance matrix DG of every strongly connected graph G, using what we term the additive-multiplicative block-datum G. This subsumes the previously studied additive, multiplicative, and q-distances for all graphs. (2) We introduce an invariant ?(DG) that seems novel to date, and use it to show "master" Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya (GHH) identities, which express det(DG),cof(DG) in terms of the blocks Ge. We show how these imply all previous variants. (3) We show det(.),cof(.),k(.) depend only on the block-data for not just DG, but also several minors of DG. This was not studied in any setting to date; we show it in the "most general" additive-multiplicative setting, hence in all known settings. (4) We compute D1G in closed-form; this specializes to all known variants. In particular, we recover our previous formula for D1T for additive-multiplicative trees (which itself specializes to a result of Graham-Lovasz and answers a 2006 question of Bapat-Lal-Pati.) (5) We also show that not the Laplacian, but a closely related matrix is the "correct" one to use in D1G - for the most general additive-multiplicative matrix DG of each G. As examples, we compute in closed form det(DG),cof(DG),k(DG),D1G for hypertrees.
URI
https://d8.irins.org/handle/IITG2025/20157
IITGN Knowledge Repository Developed and Managed by Library

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify