Repository logo
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Scholalry Output
  3. Publications
  4. Implications of the DLMA Solution of θ12 for IceCube Data Using Different Astrophysical Sources
 
  • Details

Implications of the DLMA Solution of θ12 for IceCube Data Using Different Astrophysical Sources

Source
Universe
Date Issued
2023-09-01
Author(s)
Ghosh, Monojit
Goswami, Srubabati
Pan, Supriya
Pavlović, Bartol
DOI
10.3390/universe9090380
Volume
9
Issue
9
Abstract
In this paper, we study the implications of the Dark Large Mixing Angle (DLMA) solutions of (Formula presented.) in the context of the IceCube data. We study the consequences in the measurement of the neutrino oscillation parameters, namely the octant of (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) in light of both Large Mixing Angle (LMA) and DLMA solutions of (Formula presented.). We find that it will be impossible for IceCube to determine the (Formula presented.) and the true nature of (Formula presented.), i.e., LMA or DLMA, at the same time. This is because of the existence of an intrinsic degeneracy at the Hamiltonian level between these parameters. Apart from that, we also identify a new degeneracy between (Formula presented.) and two solutions of (Formula presented.) for a fixed value of (Formula presented.). We perform a chi-square fit using three different astrophysical sources, i.e., (Formula presented.) source, (Formula presented.) source, and n source, to find that both (Formula presented.) source and (Formula presented.) source are allowed within (Formula presented.), whereas the n source is excluded at (Formula presented.). It is difficult to make any conclusion regarding the measurement of (Formula presented.), (Formula presented.) for (Formula presented.) source. However, the (Formula presented.) (n) source prefers the higher (lower) octant of (Formula presented.) for both LMA and DLMA solution of (Formula presented.). The best-fit value of (Formula presented.) is around (Formula presented.) ((Formula presented.)) for the LMA (DLMA) solution of (Formula presented.), whereas for the DLMA (LMA) solution of (Formula presented.), the best-fit value is around (Formula presented.) ((Formula presented.)) for the (Formula presented.) (n) source. If we assume the current best-fit values of (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) to be true, then the (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) sources prefer the LMA solution of (Formula presented.), whereas the n source prefers the DLMA solution of (Formula presented.).
Publication link
https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/9/9/380/pdf?version=1692865399
URI
https://d8.irins.org/handle/IITG2025/26665
Subjects
astrophysical neutrinos | IceCube experiment | neutrino oscillation
IITGN Knowledge Repository Developed and Managed by Library

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify